Marxism Analysis of The Lower Depths Essay

Maxim Gorkys The Lower Depths shows the repugn between cle bes. Unquestionably, its focus is on the minorest of the economic completelyy low score deal being controlled by the bourgeoisie. It is also a representation of how fierce the clubhouse could be towards them and how, in turn, the multitude atomic number 18 affected by the society. Although the play talks of the story of low class stack the vagrant, the gambler, the ex-artist, the ex-aristocrat, the prostitute, and so many others, the thiefs character is the best to display the debate between the classes.Thieves are likely to be wicked, troublesome, and disobedient. However, the thief in the text projects only the wickedness and troublesomeness but is not re wholey disobedient. He is a bit subservient to the whims of their landlady. Though it is true that there are times when he doesnt want to follow what the woman says, in the end the woman would always find a way to guess him do whatever she likes. For instance, when the landlady wanted the thief to kill her husband, the thief refused. And to roleplay her plans into reality, she beats Natasha whom the thief cared well-nigh.This made the thief furious and he went to rest the landlady but he incidentally killed her husband instead. Aside from this, the fact that the landlady possess her sister Natasha made the thief adhere to her caprice. He is always defend his love and is willing to do everything to spare her from the landlord and the landladys injustice. The text embodies how the low class people resist the ideology of those in the higher classes. However, because of peck they are in, they end up going along with whatever those in higher classes demands.The lower economic groups are ignored in this text by those higher than them. The mere title of the play is distasteful. The place where the characters die is created and tagged as the lower depths by no other than the society itself. This just means that the society is also the prim ary reason for the repression experience by the people. What the society didnt realize is that these low class people are in the lower depths because they are deprived of chances to attain their goals and they are put on circumstances that destroy their self-confidence.The system of the ruling class caused the alienation of the low class people, therefore causing them not to be able to live their lives to the fullest. Also, the setting is where the characters tell their stories and debate on whether it is mend to live without illusions on ones own capability or to embrace a romanticized view of the world in order to nurse oneself from the pain of daily bread and butter. In the play, it is the character of Luka who seems to idealize everything in life and the one who demonstrate that philosophy is meant to be used as an legal instrument to initiate change.Precisely, it was him who played the opposing figure to the rest of the characters. He is an utilisation of an old man whom experiences made wise. He serves as an inspiration to everyone he meets by urging each of them to start a new life. In spite of this, his extreme optimism could also be the same reason why his life failed. And although he amazed the neglected lower class people in the lower depths, his arrival in their lives was too late that their zero and will has already taken from them. No matter how those people quiz to ascend from the social swamp, they are always shoved back into the depths.For example, when Natasha and the thief were about to begin a new life, destiny surpass them. Natasha was terribly trounce by her sister and when the thief came to confront the landlady, he accidentally killed the landlord. The al-Qaeda of the play could be about the dominance of the higher class all over the lower classes. As one of the plays characters puts it And so for all the others. Locksmiths then bootmakers and other working folk and all the agriculturals and even the gentry they live for the better manEach thinks es livin fer imself, that it turns out its fer that better man. All of them who live in the depths and all the other workers seem to believe that they are living for themselves. What they take overt realize is that they are living to work and feed the bourgeoisie. And deviation from this, the fact that the characters came from different field means that the bourgeoisie could control all aspects of the culture. To sum up, the play is a depiction of how the bourgeoisie rule the society. And the fact that the society puts the label to people shows how powerful it could affect other peoples lives.