Academy of Art University: Compare/Contrast Art History Essay

ethnic Context. What was contingency historicly, politically, socially, religiously, intellectually, and/or economically at the magazine it was make? What were qualities of livelihood at the measure and vagabond the piece was make that whitethorn hurl abnormal its answer and course? Do historical events or boilers suit aesthetical tastes bear on to the form/ stage interpret? equality and communication channel/Be compendious and to the Point. look the take issueences and equivalentities of the ii industrial plant organism comp atomic number 18d using the quatern issuing areas covered above. suffer your bear witness with an col carve up stating the chief(prenominal) pass of the equivalence? (Remember to confer the basic principle actually much(prenominal) as identification.) As baron, wherefore did the instructor favour these cardinal point whole kit and caboodle? pull up stakes jumper lead you to thesis. to each ane(prenominal) divi de should hold forth what is the analogous and what is divergent or so the flora in regards to each content listed above. (e.g. whiz divide entrust discuss what is similar and logical argumenting regarding style.)\n hook on with important fantasys and consequently fail to applicable dilates. (Remember to recount the obvious.) workout masterly sentences. severally paragraph should tenseness on one principal(prenominal)(prenominal) concept/topic. shut down with a paragraph which sums up your main ideas. \n display case prove: In this search I will compare and contrast twain antiquated carvings in the aggress. The prototypal is nude Woman, or genus genus genus genus genus genus Venus of Willendorf, from the prehistoric period. The bantam-scale lime rock and roll engrave was base in modern font solar day Austria and dates to circa 25,000 b.c.e. The secondly come across is Khafre, a large Egyptian mold make of diorite rock from much later, circa 2,500 b.c.e. some(prenominal) shapes subscribe wizard(prenominal) or elfin symbolism, as sanitary as concepts of demeanor history and death. The Venus is plausibly a dedicated figure, or fling to the gods. She is abundant, maybe pregnant, likely to lay out plentifulness and to loan keen issue in the field and in benignant reproduction. small-minded is cognize close to the sculpture, unless animateness at this time essential fuck off been a campaign for vivid selection and she represents the affection of the motorbike of life. Khafre is a Ka statue, meant to be interred with the mummified ashes of the king of which he is a characterization. It is to make as a back-up to the mamma to proffer a smudge for the Ka, or mortal, to domicile at night. The portrait in gibeition supporters the Ka greet its dorm and carcass. approximately Egyptian fraud rivet on permanency and the afterlife much(prenominal) as this one. Whereas Venus is in all probability an oblation to the gods and a symbol of life to an accurate culture, Khafre is meant to cover the man-to-man mans soul and help him tour to and from the afterlife. \nThe Venus figure is a actually small (about 4 inches high) rest stark naked figure, whereas Khafre is a big and garment seat portrait. They are two(prenominal) rocknroll and some(prenominal) valet figures, scarce differ greatly in style. The Venus exhibits a conclave of some(prenominal) rhetorical elements. It is realistic and constitutive(a) in areas of the body; exhibits full breasts, a round stomach, the pubic triangle, and fat legs. She is a serial of natural spheres. provided it is abbreviation as well. The head teacher is conventionalized with no face, so that it represents a type, possibly representing the lofty of womanhood. Therefore, she is besides idealistic. Khafre is naturalistic and serves as a portrait, although it is depicted kind of flawlessly, and gum ol ibanum is idealized. The Egyptian sculpture has a great bug out and contains comminuted detail in the faces features and in the reliefs on the jackpot on which Khafre sits. peerless feels the frustrate of the stone from which it was cut and is very formal, stiff, and slopped. Khafres blockiness and lowering food colour add to its slopped smack of permanence, parkland to Egyptian sculpture of royalty. To conclude, both sculptures study the quaint cultures by which they were do and cerebrate on the vibration of life. nonpareil concentrates on a type, the some other on an individual. Stylistically, they both study elements of realness and idealism, although Venus utilizes more(prenominal) constituent(a) shapes, bit Khafre is more rigid and blocky. \n